Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 2:30:06 GMT -5
Over the past year, various studies have examined the performance differences between co-located and distributed teams, quietly assuming that members of the latter never meet in person, while members of the former work together in the same office throughout a project. But dispersion is not just a matter of degree; This is also a question of species. Most teams are distributed to some extent. They can be spatially separated (from across the hall to dispersed around the world), temporally separated (across different time zones), and structurally uneven (e.g., five members in one location and two in another ) and cultural diversity. As past research has repeatedly shown, even the smallest degree of dispersion, such as working on different floors of the same building, can greatly impact the quality of.
Collaboration. In our own research, we examined the performance of software development teams with varying degrees of dispersion, including teams with members located in different cities, countries, or continents. Such geographically distributed teams are often called virtual teams, but Job Function Email List that label is a bit of a misnomer because these teams are very real inwhat they can accomplish. We found that while virtual teams present greater management challenges, they In fact, with the right processes in place, distributed teams can significantly outperform co-located teams. Winner of the 2016 Richard Beckhard Memorial Prize The Light and Dark Sides of Dispersion.
The degree of dispersion in a team is neither predetermined nor fixed; rather, it is an organizational design parameter that companies can set and adjust. In making such decisions, managers should consider the various pros and cons of separation. Not surprisingly, multiple studies have found that remote collaboration is more difficult than collaboration in a co-located environment. Potential problems include communication and coordination difficulties, reduced trust, and an increasing inability to establish common ground. Conversely, proximity tends to promote more frequent communication and the development of closer and more positive.
Collaboration. In our own research, we examined the performance of software development teams with varying degrees of dispersion, including teams with members located in different cities, countries, or continents. Such geographically distributed teams are often called virtual teams, but Job Function Email List that label is a bit of a misnomer because these teams are very real inwhat they can accomplish. We found that while virtual teams present greater management challenges, they In fact, with the right processes in place, distributed teams can significantly outperform co-located teams. Winner of the 2016 Richard Beckhard Memorial Prize The Light and Dark Sides of Dispersion.
The degree of dispersion in a team is neither predetermined nor fixed; rather, it is an organizational design parameter that companies can set and adjust. In making such decisions, managers should consider the various pros and cons of separation. Not surprisingly, multiple studies have found that remote collaboration is more difficult than collaboration in a co-located environment. Potential problems include communication and coordination difficulties, reduced trust, and an increasing inability to establish common ground. Conversely, proximity tends to promote more frequent communication and the development of closer and more positive.