Post by account_disabled on Mar 12, 2024 0:17:24 GMT -5
At scientific events, such as congresses, symposiums, seminars, conferences, among others, it is common to publish scientific works.
This event activity can become chaos if you don't make the best decision when choosing which of the job evaluation tools to use!
An ideal system should avoid manual work, which can become critical and compromise the deadlines defined in the event planning , generating dissatisfaction among event participants.
10 Characteristics of Ideal Assessment Tools
For an event with an expectation of over 100 scientific works, a solution that facilitates the entire process of evaluating works becomes essential .
From submission, evaluation, dissemination of results and availability of work annals.
When choosing your solution among the Czech Republic Mobile Number List evaluation tools, pay attention so that participants, referees and organizers can carry out their activities without problems.
In addition to the basic features, some features are essential to speed up the entire process of submitting and evaluating scientific work
1. Simplicity and agility
This is a critical point.
Everyone must adapt to a new solution with the lowest learning curve possible and without the need for manuals.
The activities must be clear and intuitive for everyone, participants, referees and organizers.
Agility is also a key point!
Mainly for events with a high number of scientific works, submissions must have simple forms.
This event activity can become chaos if you don't make the best decision when choosing which of the job evaluation tools to use!
An ideal system should avoid manual work, which can become critical and compromise the deadlines defined in the event planning , generating dissatisfaction among event participants.
10 Characteristics of Ideal Assessment Tools
For an event with an expectation of over 100 scientific works, a solution that facilitates the entire process of evaluating works becomes essential .
From submission, evaluation, dissemination of results and availability of work annals.
When choosing your solution among the Czech Republic Mobile Number List evaluation tools, pay attention so that participants, referees and organizers can carry out their activities without problems.
In addition to the basic features, some features are essential to speed up the entire process of submitting and evaluating scientific work
1. Simplicity and agility
This is a critical point.
Everyone must adapt to a new solution with the lowest learning curve possible and without the need for manuals.
The activities must be clear and intuitive for everyone, participants, referees and organizers.
Agility is also a key point!
Mainly for events with a high number of scientific works, submissions must have simple forms.