Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 4:45:15 GMT -5
The challenge was to overcome the participation bar
Reduce the credibility of the right-wing strategy. The point is that it was possible to question it, reduce its credibility in society and its effectiveness in its application, as well as prepare conditions for its substantial modification. Progress would be made towards the objective of its suppression, which will remain a firm task to continue. Finally, the progressive Government introduced its repeal within the government coalition pact, an issue that will now be applied. This bet did not achieve the total productive paralysis of the country nor a generalized participation of the entire population, but it has the necessary social support on two fundamental levels: sufficient active participation (in the strikes and all activities and demonstrations of support), and broad social legitimacy, having the rejection of the majority of citizens to this labor reform. It was an act of democratic reaffirmation and stimulation of citizen participation, stopping social regression and demanding another socioeconomic, labor and employment policy.
The impact of the general strike of MarchThe process of the general strike on March 29 allowed a massive collective expression of citizens against the 'aggressive' labor reform and the policy of deep socio-labor cuts of the PP Government. Broad worker and citizen participation was an essential step to stop its antisocial offensive, eroded its legitimacy and reinforced the social left and the union movement in their demand for decent employment and full social and labor rights. A detailed and complete analysis of the level of Australia Phone Number participation was difficult to carry out, with little reliable data and much division between different sources. The official figure provided by the unions. and had more than 10 million strikers, 77% of the salaried population (once deducting 1.3 million in minimum services). Business and government sources indicated 'poor' follow-up (15% in public administration) and liberal and right-wing media even spoke of 'union defeat'. Media related to the socialist parliamentary opposition highlighted a significant but not general participation ('partial or sectoral'). Various opinion polls reflected a willingness to participate in the strike of at least a third of employees (about five million) along with a majority who were against the labor reform and considered the union mobilization legitimate.
Other indicators, such as electricity consumption, placed it in a range similar to those of 2010 and 2002, and far from the exceptional nature of the generalized paralysis of productive and citizen activity in December 1988. However, several significant or differential facts can be pointed out and some lessons learned. First, the participation in the strikes of the salaried layers was somewhat higher than that of September 29, 2010 (and similar to that of 2002). Its distribution is uneven. Very widespread in large industry, construction and transportation; important in the public sector, particularly in education, and with less impact on SMEs in the service sector and the financial sector. Likewise, it had a great impact in large industrial and urban centers and less in areas with a predominance of the service sector and in medium and small towns. In particular, a much greater impact was noted in Euskadi and Navarra (and somewhat also in Galicia) when the calls of the nationalist unions (ELA, LAB, CIG...) and the confederal unions and UGT) converged than in.
Reduce the credibility of the right-wing strategy. The point is that it was possible to question it, reduce its credibility in society and its effectiveness in its application, as well as prepare conditions for its substantial modification. Progress would be made towards the objective of its suppression, which will remain a firm task to continue. Finally, the progressive Government introduced its repeal within the government coalition pact, an issue that will now be applied. This bet did not achieve the total productive paralysis of the country nor a generalized participation of the entire population, but it has the necessary social support on two fundamental levels: sufficient active participation (in the strikes and all activities and demonstrations of support), and broad social legitimacy, having the rejection of the majority of citizens to this labor reform. It was an act of democratic reaffirmation and stimulation of citizen participation, stopping social regression and demanding another socioeconomic, labor and employment policy.
The impact of the general strike of MarchThe process of the general strike on March 29 allowed a massive collective expression of citizens against the 'aggressive' labor reform and the policy of deep socio-labor cuts of the PP Government. Broad worker and citizen participation was an essential step to stop its antisocial offensive, eroded its legitimacy and reinforced the social left and the union movement in their demand for decent employment and full social and labor rights. A detailed and complete analysis of the level of Australia Phone Number participation was difficult to carry out, with little reliable data and much division between different sources. The official figure provided by the unions. and had more than 10 million strikers, 77% of the salaried population (once deducting 1.3 million in minimum services). Business and government sources indicated 'poor' follow-up (15% in public administration) and liberal and right-wing media even spoke of 'union defeat'. Media related to the socialist parliamentary opposition highlighted a significant but not general participation ('partial or sectoral'). Various opinion polls reflected a willingness to participate in the strike of at least a third of employees (about five million) along with a majority who were against the labor reform and considered the union mobilization legitimate.
Other indicators, such as electricity consumption, placed it in a range similar to those of 2010 and 2002, and far from the exceptional nature of the generalized paralysis of productive and citizen activity in December 1988. However, several significant or differential facts can be pointed out and some lessons learned. First, the participation in the strikes of the salaried layers was somewhat higher than that of September 29, 2010 (and similar to that of 2002). Its distribution is uneven. Very widespread in large industry, construction and transportation; important in the public sector, particularly in education, and with less impact on SMEs in the service sector and the financial sector. Likewise, it had a great impact in large industrial and urban centers and less in areas with a predominance of the service sector and in medium and small towns. In particular, a much greater impact was noted in Euskadi and Navarra (and somewhat also in Galicia) when the calls of the nationalist unions (ELA, LAB, CIG...) and the confederal unions and UGT) converged than in.